Questions linger about seafood safety, but FDA says consumers have little to fear, Press Register, November 28, 2010:
Every Gulf fish that the government has tested since workers shut off the oil spewing from BP’s ruptured well in mid-July has shown toxins far below what is dangerous, federal authorities say. ...
“These chemicals, these are PAHs that are carcinogenic. ... These items are not in any way appropriate for anyone to eat," said Ed Cake, an environmental consultant from Ocean Springs. “There’s no low-dose level that’s acceptable to eat."...
[William Sawyer], the Florida toxicologist, said the government tests do not look for total petroleum hydrocarbons in the seafood. He said his tests of Gulf shrimp have shown unsafe levels of the compounds, which can cause liver or kidney damage in a matter of weeks.
You guys in the North Gulf need to leave - hanging on will just get you deader - I would get up to Atlanta - they have good hospitals and Hospices.
So... the local officials that are participating and/or covering this up... and the organizations that are applying the dispersant.. these folks are immune to toxins or something?
Well, they arent.Shall we call it "interesting" when their kin starts getting sick and dying?
oh.. ya... i forgot to add when they themselves start dying.......
(MDCH) is "still" Advising that People Not Eat Fish or Swim in Talmadge Creek or the Kalamazoo River
... http://beforeitsnews.com/story/290/851/
And No Corexit was used there. just oil contamination !